What the latest social media craze says about women, technology and feminist theory.
Two recent essays by Larry Sanger and Evgeny Morozov highlight the absence of academic influence in the framing of theories of new technologies, leaving business orientated experts to dominate the conversation. Where is the Marshall McLuhan of social media?
During the London riots, the mob of so many well-connected cyborgs did what mobs today do: they became augmented, blurring onto digital space mostly via the popular and mostly private Blackberry messaging service.
Don’t you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought?
If faux-vintage photography is rooted in authenticity, then what is more real than war?
Is Google+ all it promises to be? Nathan Jurgenson takes a look at this new service with a critical eye.
The relative lack of obsession of the images in this scandal strikes me as evidence of the weaker regulation of the male body and men’s sex.
Social media increasingly force us to view our present as always a potential documented past.
How separate are the digital and physical worlds? A debate has ensued on the blog Cyborgology on what it means to live in an ‘augmented reality’.
David Carr makes the same mistake as the film The Social Network: blaming all of social media for the actions of the few rude and socially inept users.
Obama-as-president has thus far been a Web 1.0 leader instead of embracing the Web 2.0 ethic of users collaboratively and socially creating content.
Governments across the globe are being faced with a decision: to further solidify or become more porous.
Let’s move past the reductionist binary and acknowledge that what we are seeing is an augmented revolution, one that utilizes both the physical and digital.
Digital and physical realities are conceptualised as separate aspects of our on- and off-line selves. Nathan Jurgenson argues this distinction is becoming increasingly irrelevant.
On Jan. 8, 2011, Jared Lee Loughner allegedly shot Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) and 19 others resulting in 6 fatalities. This event has drawn attention to a number of new and important roles social media has come to play in our society, including how information is gathered, changed political rhetoric, and how these sites handle the profiles [...]
If governments did not mislead their citizens so often, there would be less need for secrecy, and if leaders knew that they could not rely on keeping the public in the dark, they would have a powerful incentive to behave better.
Just as others lamented about the loss in depth when moving from the physical to the digital word, others are now claiming the loss of depth when moving from email to more instant forms of communication.
The stigmatization of digital dirt may be eroding, but eroding for whom?
The term “cyberbullying” is frequently used to describe hurtful behaviors occurring via communication technologies. But why distinguish “cyber” bullying from other forms of bullying?